Una cosilla...... eso que dices de las DNS, que las de euskaltel son lentas......... no estoy yo tan seguro eh!, ese analisis al que haces referencia está hecho desde madrid, normal que desde alli los servidores DNS de euskaltel vayan como una patata, pero aqui en Bilbao, estos son mis pings a esos servidores, podrás ver que los de euskaltel son claramente mas rapidos que por ejemplo los de telefonica que son los mas rapidos de la lista esa que nos dices.
Aquí van:
Primero los de TELEFONICA (17 paquetes):
PING 80.58.0.33 (80.58.0.33) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 80.58.0.33: icmp_seq=1 ttl=116 time=18.3 ms
64 bytes from 80.58.0.33: icmp_seq=2 ttl=116 time=39.7 ms
64 bytes from 80.58.0.33: icmp_seq=3 ttl=116 time=19.3 ms
64 bytes from 80.58.0.33: icmp_seq=4 ttl=116 time=19.0 ms
64 bytes from 80.58.0.33: icmp_seq=5 ttl=116 time=20.9 ms
64 bytes from 80.58.0.33: icmp_seq=6 ttl=116 time=281 ms
64 bytes from 80.58.0.33: icmp_seq=7 ttl=116 time=18.4 ms
64 bytes from 80.58.0.33: icmp_seq=8 ttl=116 time=18.3 ms
64 bytes from 80.58.0.33: icmp_seq=9 ttl=116 time=18.4 ms
64 bytes from 80.58.0.33: icmp_seq=10 ttl=116 time=18.3 ms
64 bytes from 80.58.0.33: icmp_seq=11 ttl=116 time=36.2 ms
64 bytes from 80.58.0.33: icmp_seq=12 ttl=116 time=19.8 ms
64 bytes from 80.58.0.33: icmp_seq=13 ttl=116 time=20.2 ms
64 bytes from 80.58.0.33: icmp_seq=14 ttl=116 time=18.5 ms
64 bytes from 80.58.0.33: icmp_seq=15 ttl=116 time=19.3 ms
64 bytes from 80.58.0.33: icmp_seq=16 ttl=116 time=19.5 ms
64 bytes from 80.58.0.33: icmp_seq=17 ttl=116 time=209 ms
--- 80.58.0.33 ping statistics ---
17 packets transmitted, 17 received, 0% packet loss, time 16019ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 18.306/47.977/281.200/73.389 ms
PING 80.58.0.97 (80.58.0.97) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 80.58.0.97: icmp_seq=1 ttl=116 time=17.4 ms
64 bytes from 80.58.0.97: icmp_seq=2 ttl=116 time=17.3 ms
64 bytes from 80.58.0.97: icmp_seq=3 ttl=116 time=18.7 ms
64 bytes from 80.58.0.97: icmp_seq=4 ttl=116 time=19.4 ms
64 bytes from 80.58.0.97: icmp_seq=5 ttl=116 time=19.1 ms
64 bytes from 80.58.0.97: icmp_seq=6 ttl=116 time=581 ms
64 bytes from 80.58.0.97: icmp_seq=7 ttl=116 time=21.7 ms
64 bytes from 80.58.0.97: icmp_seq=8 ttl=116 time=20.9 ms
64 bytes from 80.58.0.97: icmp_seq=9 ttl=116 time=20.3 ms
64 bytes from 80.58.0.97: icmp_seq=10 ttl=116 time=44.5 ms
64 bytes from 80.58.0.97: icmp_seq=11 ttl=116 time=17.4 ms
64 bytes from 80.58.0.97: icmp_seq=12 ttl=116 time=18.3 ms
64 bytes from 80.58.0.97: icmp_seq=13 ttl=116 time=17.7 ms
64 bytes from 80.58.0.97: icmp_seq=14 ttl=116 time=17.8 ms
64 bytes from 80.58.0.97: icmp_seq=15 ttl=116 time=18.9 ms
64 bytes from 80.58.0.97: icmp_seq=16 ttl=116 time=19.3 ms
64 bytes from 80.58.0.97: icmp_seq=17 ttl=116 time=612 ms
--- 80.58.0.97 ping statistics ---
17 packets transmitted, 17 received, 0% packet loss, time 16022ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 17.333/88.419/612.196/185.832 ms
Ahora los de EUSKALTEL (mismo numero de paquetes):
PING 212.55.8.133 (212.55.8.133) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 212.55.8.133: icmp_seq=1 ttl=252 time=10.5 ms
64 bytes from 212.55.8.133: icmp_seq=2 ttl=252 time=9.02 ms
64 bytes from 212.55.8.133: icmp_seq=3 ttl=252 time=8.17 ms
64 bytes from 212.55.8.133: icmp_seq=4 ttl=252 time=16.4 ms
64 bytes from 212.55.8.133: icmp_seq=5 ttl=252 time=8.27 ms
64 bytes from 212.55.8.133: icmp_seq=6 ttl=252 time=9.05 ms
64 bytes from 212.55.8.133: icmp_seq=7 ttl=252 time=7.80 ms
64 bytes from 212.55.8.133: icmp_seq=8 ttl=252 time=8.43 ms
64 bytes from 212.55.8.133: icmp_seq=9 ttl=252 time=30.0 ms
64 bytes from 212.55.8.133: icmp_seq=10 ttl=252 time=12.9 ms
64 bytes from 212.55.8.133: icmp_seq=11 ttl=252 time=10.5 ms
64 bytes from 212.55.8.133: icmp_seq=12 ttl=252 time=9.93 ms
64 bytes from 212.55.8.133: icmp_seq=13 ttl=252 time=9.44 ms
64 bytes from 212.55.8.133: icmp_seq=14 ttl=252 time=8.95 ms
64 bytes from 212.55.8.133: icmp_seq=15 ttl=252 time=33.2 ms
64 bytes from 212.55.8.133: icmp_seq=16 ttl=252 time=11.0 ms
64 bytes from 212.55.8.133: icmp_seq=17 ttl=252 time=8.46 ms
--- 212.55.8.133 ping statistics ---
17 packets transmitted, 17 received, 0% packet loss, time 16022ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 7.802/12.499/33.290/7.318 ms
PING 212.55.8.132 (212.55.8.132) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 212.55.8.132: icmp_seq=1 ttl=252 time=9.97 ms
64 bytes from 212.55.8.132: icmp_seq=2 ttl=252 time=9.43 ms
64 bytes from 212.55.8.132: icmp_seq=3 ttl=252 time=11.3 ms
64 bytes from 212.55.8.132: icmp_seq=4 ttl=252 time=28.0 ms
64 bytes from 212.55.8.132: icmp_seq=5 ttl=252 time=8.73 ms
64 bytes from 212.55.8.132: icmp_seq=6 ttl=252 time=10.1 ms
64 bytes from 212.55.8.132: icmp_seq=7 ttl=252 time=10.0 ms
64 bytes from 212.55.8.132: icmp_seq=8 ttl=252 time=148 ms
64 bytes from 212.55.8.132: icmp_seq=9 ttl=252 time=9.29 ms
64 bytes from 212.55.8.132: icmp_seq=10 ttl=252 time=8.76 ms
64 bytes from 212.55.8.132: icmp_seq=11 ttl=252 time=19.5 ms
64 bytes from 212.55.8.132: icmp_seq=12 ttl=252 time=26.7 ms
64 bytes from 212.55.8.132: icmp_seq=13 ttl=252 time=41.4 ms
64 bytes from 212.55.8.132: icmp_seq=14 ttl=252 time=40.6 ms
64 bytes from 212.55.8.132: icmp_seq=15 ttl=252 time=120 ms
64 bytes from 212.55.8.132: icmp_seq=16 ttl=252 time=9.22 ms
64 bytes from 212.55.8.132: icmp_seq=17 ttl=252 time=11.7 ms
--- 212.55.8.132 ping statistics ---
17 packets transmitted, 17 received, 0% packet loss, time 16019ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 8.730/30.878/148.906/39.709 ms
Si miramos las medias....
Euskaltel medias: 30.878 ms
12.499 ms
Telefonica medias: 88.419 ms
47.977 ms
Asi que desde mi punto de vista, son mas rapidas las de euskaltel no?? Si no es asi que alguien me corriga ;)
Saludos!